Hello friends. I would just like to say that I fully support Obama, and it is my opinion that any Lightworker with a basic sense of discernment can see past all of the propaganda about him that is constantly shoved in our faces. Have you ever noticed that it seems impossible to reason with somebody who is anti-Obama? I have not had anybody actually tell me a legitimate reason to hate Obama without throwing in a bunch of nasty labels, (I.E.- “I don’t like Obama because he is a socialist marxist corporate money-grubbing puppet”) What is up with that?
I understand that some feel dissapointed that Obama hasn’t seem to have come through in what he promised, but that is discussed in this message from Steve Beckow. Thanks Steve! :)
I nearly died of a heart attack when I read a prominent lightworker mentioning a White Hats Report that included the following statements about President Obama:
“We have been informed once again that Obama has flipped and flopped on the World Global Settlements. …
“Since our White Hats Report # 16 wherein we explain that President Obama had moved the funds from the Vatican Bank into a trading program with Josef Ackermann at Deutsche Bank, his trading profits have far exceeded 3 Billion Dollars according to Falcone’s investigators. …
“It doesn’t take a genius to talk knowledgeably of Obama’s greed and narcissism in destroying America.” (1)
However, as it turned out, the lightworker mentioned them only to refute them.
We all of us base our political knowledge on some sources since none of us have access to any of the individuals involved. Many commentators base their knowledge on political “insiders” or “intelligence” sources. I don’t choose to go that route myself. I base mine on information supplied by the Company of Light (celestials, galactics, and ascended masters).
And they’ve been staunch in their support of the President. (2)
Rather than rehearse the whole of their comments, I’d simply prefer to record what Mathew said recently, acknowledging what lies behind the tsunami of criticism:
“A few months ago Hatonn spoke with great passion about the powerful opposition President Obama is dealing with and the need for your supportive thoughts and prayers for him and his family. Still, my mother is besieged with emails asking why the president is taking one action or another that maintains or worsens the very situations he was elected to remedy.
“The questioners, who may be attributing more authority to the office than the constitution does, are not recognizing that this government has long been the Illuminati’s bastion and their purpose in creating the misconception about the country. Their hold on many members of Congress still is strong, and only after that control ends will Obama be able to guide his administration toward national reforms and the peaceful world he is dedicated to achieving.” (3)
A few years ago, Matthew commented on the strategy the Illuminati’s henchmen were following in their attacks on the President:
“Is Obama leading the nation into socialism, and, if so, was this always his intention? Attaching ‘socialism’ to his leadership is a strategy to create anxiety, distress and dissension among the citizens. When labels are applied to any government, movement, group, or philosophy, the labelers’ intent is to undermine its genuine value because that conflicts with their ideas or motives. Witness the effectiveness of ‘conspiracy theorist’ applied to anyone who questioned the official reports about the assassination of US President Kennedy or who was responsible for ’9/11.’” (4)
It’s interesting that President Bush’s administration could bring down the World Trade Center, blow up the Pentagon, start illegal wars that resulted in the deaths of thousands, if not millions, of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, apparently use cocaine in the White House if reports are correct, (5) and do assorted other reprehensible things and yet opposition to Bush never reached the levels of acrimony they have against President Obama.
Well, maybe that isn’t so strange since the same sources that worked such great destruction on 9/11 and later are, according to Matthew, behind attempts to darken the reputation of the President.
I say this knowing that the President agreed to be part of the subterfuge around Osama bin Laden’s “death” earlier this year in Abbotabad. Not a good move. I append Matthew Ward’s comments on the bin Laden matter. (6)
I remember reading biographies of Abraham Lincoln when I was young and hearing that he too had made a few unwise decisions comparable to this one. I can’t recall what they were any more, but my recollection was that they were subterfuges as well, that he agreed to them under duress and that he later regretted them.
Matthew has suggested we neither condone nor condemn the bin Laden subterfuge. I’m following his lead on the matter, which I find hard to do. But the Light has never abandoned the President and I don’t plan to either, no matter how many allegations are made against him. It’s my belief that in a short time subterfuge will no longer be practiced and the truth about everything to do with the President and his detractors will emerge.
(2) See the articles under the breakout page entitled “This Site is Pro-Obama.”
(3) Matthew’s Message, March 12, 2011, at http://www.matthewbooks.com/
(4) Matthew’s Message, June 24, 2009.
(5) “Secret Service members attached to White House domestic security, FBI and CIA agents, and written national security field reports all confirm that President Bush has been using drugs which could be affecting his performance as the nation’s war-time commander-in-chief.
“Multiple federal agents having direct knowledge and access to Bush’s medical records say the President has switched from using Ritalin to taking Prozac while also succumbing to periodic alcoholic binges which have led to tirades and explosive personal conduct among White House aides, absent required random drug testing of all public employees and elected officials.
“Federal law enforcement agents have at different times witnessed President Bush doing lines of cocaine in the early morning hours at the White House and drinking straight shots of whiskey in the evening hours on other occasions, according to U.S. intelligence sources who confirm multiple stories appearing in the tabloid press which say the First Lady is assigned to ‘keep an eye on him.’” (Tom Flocco, “Secret Service, U.S. intel say Bush uses cocaine, Prozac, alcohol,” TomFlocco.Com, 17 Nov. 2005, downloaded from http://tomflocco.com/fs/SecretServIntelSay.htm, 7 August 2007.)
(6) Here are Matthew’s comments on the bin Laden subterfuge:
“On and off-planet members in the vanguard of the light forces, who know that a great deal must be accomplished rapidly, agreed that it must begin with the emergence of truths so the peoples will demand the changes that have been formulated to achieve a transformed and peaceful world. The members agreed that no time can be wasted in disclosing the truths that the Illuminati have kept hidden by assassinating knowledgeable persons or ridiculing them into professional oblivion and labeling anyone who believes them a “conspiracy theorist.”
“The members also agreed that something dramatic was required to get the peoples’ attention; however, because it is your world, it was up to your leaders to decide what that would be. Announcing that members of other civilizations are among you required resolving myriad details before it could be properly presented, and the suggestion that all truths be told straightforwardly was vetoed because there was no agreement as to which should be revealed first—in essence, which finger should be pulled out of the dike. Some felt that would best be achieved by announcing the death of Osama bin Laden, the officially accused mastermind of “9/11.” They felt that announcement could be veered into exposing the truth about the horrific events of that day almost ten years ago, and it would eliminate fear in the people who believe what they so often have been told: No one is safe as long as bin Laden is alive.
“Only when that suggestion was raised did some in the group, including US President Obama, know for certain that the man had been dead for almost a decade, and those few vehemently denounced the suggestion. But since no one had any other idea that would get the attention of the world, the majority voted to ‘kill bin Laden’ and later publicly explain why that story was released.
“It can be argued that deception to achieve a positive goal is ‘better’ than deception to embark upon a negative goal. It is not our desire or our purpose to judge the decision, much less judge those who made it, but only to relate the information given us by Earth’s monitors in Nirvana. They do not know how the explanation for the decision will come because the responsible parties are still discussing strategies for the next steps.
“Regardless of how this plays out, by the end of next year, the light will have vanquished all darkness on Earth—this has been assured from the beginning of her ascension. You can best serve in your capacity as lightworkers by neither condoning nor condemning the bin Laden story, but rather by adding your light to its intention—to speed disclosure of all truths so reforms also can come swiftly. And for those leaders who know the greater urgency, the intention is for all persons to have the opportunity to embrace the light within truth before it is too late for them to physically go along with Earth if they chose that journey in their soul contracts.” (Matthew’s Message, May 8, 2011.)